HomeBank voles as potential new animal model for Type 1, and 2, diabetes.Background for the discovery.Polydipsia (excessive drinking) among captive rats was already described by John L. Falk, (1969) but Grethe Sorensen and Axel Randrup (1986) were the first to describe this polydipsia among Danish Bank voles although without making a connection to Diabetes. Nine years later, I (Bryan Schønecker) had started on my thesis work at the Institute of Biology, University of Copenhagen, which started out as an attempt to see if stereotypies were heritable among bank voles (see here for bank vole stereotypies and here for a more general walk through the subject of stereotypies of mammals). At the time it was a widespread belief, at least at my University and probably everywhere else, that polydipsia among Bank voles were a sort of behaviour, maybe stereotypic in nature and maybe related to the phenomenon of scheduled induced polydipsia (SIP), but certainly not simply a disease. However, quite soon I started to note certain peculiarities with these polydipsic Bank voles. They had a markedly increased mortality, tumour-like swellings around eyes, the jaw/neck region and in the armpits (could therefore be related to the lymphatic system); showed weight-loss, tousled fur and a pronounced tendency to walk on the heals after longer time of showing polydipsia. Based on these observations I became more and more sure that this polydipsia among Bank voles were not a part of some kind of behavioural program, but then again, I had not started to speculate what could alternatively be wrong. Presented with my observations it did not take the then graduate student Irene Vejgaard Sørensen more than a couple of seconds to formulate the hypothesis that the Bank voles "obviously were suffering from Diabetes mellitus!". This diagnose explained my observations perfectly and after that it was a simple matter to confirm the diagnose by measuring strongly elevated blood- and urine glucose values, measurements I made together with a second graduate student, Tonny Freimanis. These elevated urine glucose values were later published in Schoenecker et al., (2000), which described the development of stereotypies and polydipsia among Bank voles along with the hypothesis that polydipsic Bank voles were indeed suffering from Diabetes mellitus. Furthermore the paper provided the observation that stereotypic behaviour was correlated with both an almost 50% reduction of diabetes among females and a delay in the onset of diabetes for those females that later became diabetic. The extreme blood glucose values we measured at the same time were published in Freimanis et al. (2003). Tonny Freimanis made a thesis work focussing on how different types of stress would influence later development of stereotypies and polydipsia among Bank voles. It was first at an advanced stage of his work that we documented that polydipsia was a very reliably correlate of diabetes among these Bank voles. Subsequent analyses of his data showed that one specific type of stress, implemented once a week the first three weeks after birth seemed to promote the development of diabetes while the same type of stress, performed each day for the first three weeks, had the opposite effect (Freimanis et al. (2003). It therefore seem that the fraction of diabetic Bank voles can be considerably manipulated by using early experienced stress as tool. Exactly what types of stress is most effective for the purpose; which timing duration and frequency is the best is all variables which has only been superficially investigated until now. As seen in Table 1 (below) roughly twice as many males as females developed diabetes and what could be seen in Freimanis' experiment was that stress applied once a week for the first three weeks drove the females up to the male frequency (which increased a bit too albeit not significantly). Stress applied once a day for the first three weeks post-natal was instead instrumental in reducing the later occurrences of diabetes dramatically. In my later work, mainly with Knud Erik Heller and Mogens Bildsøe (both from the University of Copenhagen, Denmark), a joint venture was initiated with Bo Niklasson (part-owner of the Swedish private company Apodemus AB) and Ake Lernmark (University of Washington, USA) during which our initial diagnose of Diabetes mellitus among these Danish Bank voles was confirmed and further characterized to be Type 1 Diabetes (Niklasson et al., 2003a). During a stay in USA (2001) I further found indications that North American Bank voles (C. gapperi) might develop diabetes in captivity (own unpublished data). Later it turned out that Swedish Bank voles too can develop type 1 diabetes in captivity (Niklasson et al., 2003b). Development of diabetes among captive Bank voles therefore seem to be a rather common phenomenon but due to insufficient information's it is still to soon to more than speculate to what extent Bank voles from different regions differ from each other when it comes to prevalence and seriousness in their development of diabetes. Results confirming the diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes .
Indications of a Type 2-like diabetes.
Using Stress as a method to modulate occurence of Type 1 Diabetes.
Type 1 diabetes in Bank voles maybe reversible after treatment with Pleconaril.
Prevalence and average age at onset of diabetes.In practice it has turned out that polydipsia, as defined by a daily water intake in the excess of 21 ml, is a reliably indicator for a diabetic Bank vole. Table two below (modified after Schoenecker et al., 2000) describes the average percentages of Bank voles in my first F1 generation (n Males= 138; n Females= 110) which developed diabetes mellitus (DM) or Diabetes and Stereotypies (DMS) as well as the average age of onset. The number of voles used in this Table is 85 Males and 60 females, which were characterized as either diabetics, stereotypers or both.
From the table over this cohort it can be seen that over twice as many males as females developed diabetes and the same was true even if the diabetics were summed together with the voles that developed both diabetes and stereotypies (p< 0.001 in both cases). Furthermore it can be seen that diabetes among DMS voles seemed to have a later onset (79 days vs. 63 days; p non-significant), a difference which was particular evident among the females (114 days vs. 74 days; p< 0.05). Lastly this table can be used to calculate that non-stereotypers seemed considerable more prone to develop diabetes than stereotypers (34% vs. 20%; p< 0.05). Average daily water intakes for Bank voles.My thesis ("Stereotypical behaviour among Bank voles", Zoological Institute, University of Copenhagen, 1998) involved 92 (P); 248 (F1) and 270 (F2) Bank voles and in Table 3 below it can be seen that the maximum measures of daily water intake in these two captivity-born generations is quite comparable with the data we published in Schoenecker et al., 2000, a paper which only dealt with the P- and F1generation. A non-diabetic/non-stereotypic vole is in the following designated "W" (wildtype); a diabetic "DM"; a stereotypic "S" and a diabetic/stereotypic "DMS".
From Table 3 it can be seen that a diabetic male consumes a bit more water than a diabetic female (Males weigh a bit more too) and this water intake corresponds roughly to three times their body weight. Using only data from F1 revealed no gender differences at all, only that S females drank more water than W females (p< 0.05). Combining data from F1 and F2 resulted in a clear gender difference among both the diabetics (males drank the most; p= 0.0013) and the stereotypers (females drank more; p= 0.0003). Again the stereotyping females from F1+F2 drank more than the non-stereotyping females (p= 0.0001) but the reason that performing in stereotypies increase only the female consumption and not the male- is probably interesting, but at present unresolved. Easy method to screen for diabetic Bank voles.The easiest method is simply to keep the bank voles in transparent cages and take a glance through the bottom while changing the cages with clean ones. If there is a beginning, or big, reddish/brown spot with a greasy appearance (bacteria) you have a polydipsic, and hence diabetic bank vole. It's easy to measure the water consumption each time you provide the Bank vole with a fresh bottle - just weigh the bottles and most databases has a function to insert a date and time and use such data in a homemade formula to calculate the daily water consumption. Shift the bottles once a week and you will probably have no problems with calcium in the bottlenoses. You can measure the weight too as additional data. I cannot recommend using orbital bleedings to provide blood samples for glucose measurements. Many of my Bank voles later contracted severe eye problems and there is absolutely no reason to expose the animals for un-necessary sufferings. It is quite feasible to take a blood sample from the saphenous vein in the lower leg instead - a technique I used with no problems at all in Seattle. Read this for a thorough description or read Hem & Solberg (1998). Summing up:Subsequent to capture and transport to the place where it is convenient to extract blood samples to measure glucose there are relatively few Danish voles that exhibit hyperglycaemia as opposed to Swedish Bank voles which have elevated blood glucose in rich numbers (Niklasson et al., 2003b; 2006a). Apparently there were nothing wrong with their pancreases in this study so to diagnose them as diabetics in the wild is to stretch the definition of what is required to be a diabetic. It has been suggested that the reason for this hyperglycaemia among Swedish wildcaugh Bank voles should be social stress because of a high population density (Niklasson et al., 2003b; 2006a). However that explanation do not seem likely to me for various reasons. After a while in captivity, Danish bank voles develop clinical signs of type 1 diabetes in high frequencies. The average age for onset is typically a couple of months for captivity-born males and roughly 0.5 - 1 months later for the females. (Schoenecker et al., 2000). The most blatant signs are a total destruction of the insulin producing islets accompanied with prominent vacuolisations (Niklasson et al., 2003a). Diabetic Bank voles harbour antibodies against GAD65, IA-2, insulin and Ljungan virus (a virus which have a certain resemblance to GAD65 - Niklasson et al., 2003a). They loose weight and develop various symptoms of diabetes-related diseases after longer times of suffering from diabetes. Infiltrations of mononuclear cells were only seen among a few Bank voles. Males normally become diabetic twice as often as females, but females can easily be "stressed-up" to male levels. Swedish bank voles apparently develop a type 2-like diabetes (Blixt et al., 2007) but surprisingly enough, the author's refrain from discussing the possibility of genetically based differences concerning the diabetes which is evident among Swedish and Danish bank voles, geographically separated as they have been for thousands of years. Natural differences in genetic make-up could be thought to influence the prevailing type of diabetes, the prevalence and age of onset. The diffuse concept of "Stress" is consequently, as first demonstrated by Freimanis et al. (2003), clearly a factor which can be used to modulate the prevalence of diabetes among captive Bank voles. Using the proper methods it is to be expected that up to 50-60% of Danish Bank voles will develop diabetes mellitus in captivity. Ljungan virus may be involved as ethiological agent behind bank vole diabetes but so far (May, 2010) only two papers (Niklasson et al. 2003a and 2003b) have specifically addressed the issue. The results associated presence of Ljungan virus antibodies with diabetes in these animals, but any causality has obviously not been proven. In fact (and quoting from Blixt, 2010): "Attempts to determine with accuracy if an individual diabetic bank vole is LV infected or not, have so far not been successful." As far as I am informed it is still not possible to acquire virus-free Bank voles (Niklasson et al., 2003b; 2006a; 2006b; Blixt et al., 2007) but I assume that can only be a question of demand. Conclusion:Based on the available information's Bank voles seem to be a suitable animal model to study the complications of an untreated diabetes. The tendency to develop this disease seems to be easily moderated by early-experienced stress which makes the Bank voles promising to study the causalities behind diabetes. Ljungan virus seems to be an important etiological factor behind Bank vole diabetes but that remains to be proven using a Ljungan virus-free colony. An interaction between stereotypies and diabetes is evident. Bank voles are easy maintained in a stable; they are large enough to deliver blood samples and they breed well in captivity so if the possibility comes around then here is an interesting new lean rodent model for type 1 diabetes. Compared to NOD mice and BB rats this model has only been most superficially investigated, which in my opinion is only a further encouragement. Last updated the 27th May, 2010
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||